Filevine MCP vs Australian Law MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Filevine MCP and Australian Law MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Filevine MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: filevine_search_projects, filevine_describe_sections, filevine_get_section.

Explore Filevine MCP Details

Choose Australian Law MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_law, get_law_text, get_law_as_at.

Explore Australian Law MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Filevine MCP Legal	Australian Law MCP Legal
Summary	MCP server for Filevine matter management - by Advocate Cloud Solutions.	Read Australian Commonwealth law as it stood on any date, and verify citations against the register
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "filevine-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "filevine-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "australian-law-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "australian-law-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons