Australian Law MCP vs Filevine MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Australian Law MCP and Filevine MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Australian Law MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_law, get_law_text, get_law_as_at.

Explore Australian Law MCP Details

Choose Filevine MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: filevine_search_projects, filevine_describe_sections, filevine_get_section.

Explore Filevine MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Australian Law MCP Legal	Filevine MCP Legal
Summary	Read Australian Commonwealth law as it stood on any date, and verify citations against the register	MCP server for Filevine matter management - by Advocate Cloud Solutions.
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "australian-law-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "australian-law-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "filevine-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "filevine-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons