Filevine MCP vs Malt MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Filevine MCP and Malt MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose Filevine MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: authenticate, auth-status, logout.

Explore Filevine MCP Details

Choose Malt MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: authenticate, get_profile, get_statistics.

Explore Malt MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F Filevine MCP Developer Tools	Malt MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Open-source MCP server connecting Claude to Filevine practice management. Built by Oktopeak.	MCP server for Malt.fr. Read your freelance profile, stats, and missions from Claude.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "filevine-mcp-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "filevine-mcp-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "malt-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "Setup"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons