Filesystem vs STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch
A side-by-side look at the Filesystem and STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
S
STEADYWRK Field Service DispatchSupport & Service Management · Remote HTTP/SSEField service dispatch: instant quotes, tracked work orders, public evals. steadywrk.app43FairAuth: no auth requiredVerdict: choose Filesystem for file systems work as a local process; choose STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch for support & service management over a hosted endpoint. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Filesystem when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the File Systems domain.
- You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
- Its auth model fits you: No auth required.
- You want tools like
path, head, tail.
SChoose STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Support & Service Management domain.
- You prefer a remote HTTP/SSE transport.
- Its auth model fits you: No auth required.
Feature & specification comparison
Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | S STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Systems | Support & Service Management |
| Quality signal | 85/100 · Excellent | 43/100 · Fair |
| Install command | Confirmed | Confirmed |
| Transport | Local subprocess (stdio) | Remote HTTP/SSE |
| Auth | No auth required | No auth required |
| Pricing | Free | Not declared |
| Required env vars | None listed | None listed |
| Verified owner | Verified | Community listing |
| GitHub stars | 91,540 | — |
| Directory activity | 11 views 0 installs 0 upvotes | 1 views 0 installs 0 upvotes |
| Tools | 17 | Not listed |
| Full listing | View Filesystem | View STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch |
Tools & capabilities
Filesystem tools 17
pathheadtailpathscontenteditsoldTextnewTextdryRunsortBysourcedestination- +5 more on the listing page
STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Filesystem
{
"mcpServers": {
"filesystem": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem"
]
}
}
}
STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch
{
"mcpServers": {
"steadywrk-field-service-dispatch": {
"url": "https://steadywrk.app/developers/mcp"
}
}
}
Frequently asked questions
Filesystem is categorized under File Systems and uses a local stdio subprocess. STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch belongs to Support & Service Management and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Pick Filesystem for file systems work and STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch for support & service management.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Filesystem is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add filesystem and steadywrk-field-service-dispatch as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Filesystem has a quality signal of 85/100 (Excellent) with 11 views, 0 installs and 91,540 GitHub stars. STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch has 43/100 (Fair) with 1 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.