File Storage vs Filekiwi MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the File Storage and Filekiwi MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose File Storage when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore File Storage Details

Choose Filekiwi MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Filekiwi MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F File Storage Developer Tools	Filekiwi MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	Upload files and get public CDN links in chat.	Upload files to file.kiwi and get shareable links instantly.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "file-storage": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "file-storage"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "filekiwi-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@file-kiwi/filekiwi-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons