MCP Miro vs Git

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Miro and Git MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Miro when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Other Tools and Integrations domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
• You have access to required keys: MIRO_OAUTH_TOKEN.
• Primary tools included: Read board, frame, and contents, Create stickies and shapes, Bulk creation of board items.

Explore MCP Miro Details

Choose Git when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Other Tools and Integrations domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: create_entities, create_relations, add_observations.

Explore Git Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Miro evalstate Other Tools and Integrations	Git VerifiedOther Tools and Integrations
Summary	Access MIRO whiteboards, bulk create and read items. Requires OAUTH key for REST API.	Tools to read, search, and manipulate Git repositories.
Category & Scope	Other Tools and Integrations

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "evalstate-mcp-miro": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli"
      ],
      "env": {
        "MIRO_OAUTH_TOKEN": "YOUR_MIRO_OAUTH_TOKEN_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "git": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons