What is the key difference between Heimdall MCP and SiteHealth MCP?

Heimdall MCP belongs to the Monitoring category with local stdio execution, while SiteHealth MCP belongs to the Monitoring category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Heimdall MCP or SiteHealth MCP in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Heimdall MCP and SiteHealth MCP free or paid?

Heimdall MCP operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). SiteHealth MCP operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Heimdall MCP lists 6 tools with 2 views and 11 GitHub stars. SiteHealth MCP lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Heimdall MCP and SiteHealth MCP together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Heimdall MCP vs SiteHealth MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Heimdall MCP and SiteHealth MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Heimdall MCP

Monitoring · Local stdio

Quality: 53/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required

SiteHealth MCP

Monitoring · Local stdio

Quality: 35/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Heimdall MCP if you need specialized Monitoring tools running via a local process. Choose SiteHealth MCP if your workspace requires Monitoring integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Heimdall MCP when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: Transparent proxy for any MCP server, Latency measurement and JSON-RPC message interception, Trace storage in SQLite, PostgreSQL, or MySQL.

Explore Heimdall MCP Details

Choose SiteHealth MCP when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SiteHealth MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Heimdall MCP enmanuelmag Monitoring	SiteHealth MCP Monitoring
Summary	Transparent proxy for any MCP server that intercepts all JSON-RPC messages, measures latency, and stores traces in SQLite, PostgreSQL, or MySQL. Exports OpenTelemetry (OTLP) spans to Jaeger, Tempo, or Grafana. Supports stdio, HTTP, and SSE transports. npx @cardor/heimdall-mcp	Full website health audit — SSL, DNS, DMARC/SPF/DKIM, performance, uptime, links
Category & Scope	Monitoring

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Heimdall MCP Tools (6)

Transparent proxy for any MCP server

Latency measurement and JSON-RPC message interception

Trace storage in SQLite, PostgreSQL, or MySQL

Configurable allow/deny policies per server

OpenTelemetry (OTLP) span export to Jaeger, Tempo, Grafana

Supports stdio, HTTP, and SSE transports

SiteHealth MCP Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Heimdall MCP Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "enmanuelmag-heimdall-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem"
      ]
    }
  }
}

SiteHealth MCP Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sitehealth-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sitehealth-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Heimdall MCP is categorized under Monitoring and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, SiteHealth MCP belongs to Monitoring using local stdio subprocess. Select Heimdall MCP when you need capabilities focused on monitoring and SiteHealth MCP when you require tools for monitoring.

More alternatives to Heimdall MCP More alternatives to SiteHealth MCP Monitoring category hub