What is the key difference between Yutu and Sniff?

Yutu belongs to the Browser Automation category with local stdio execution, while Sniff belongs to the Browser Automation category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Yutu or Sniff in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Yutu and Sniff free or paid?

Yutu operates under a BYOK (Pay Provider Direct) model (OAuth 2.0). Sniff operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Yutu lists 5 tools with 4 views and 606 GitHub stars. Sniff lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Yutu and Sniff together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Yutu or Sniff in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Yutu and Sniff free to use, or do they require API keys?

Yutu is listed under a BYOK (Pay Provider Direct) model with OAuth 2.0 . Sniff operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Yutu and Sniff at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both eat-pray-ai-yutu and sniff as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Yutu has a Quality Score of 51 /100 ( Good ) with 4 views, 0 installs, and 606 GitHub stars. Sniff holds a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Yutu vs Sniff

In-depth architectural comparison of the Yutu and Sniff MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Yutu

Browser Automation · Local stdio

Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: OAuth 2.0

Sniff

Browser Automation · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Yutu if you need specialized Browser Automation tools running via a local process. Choose Sniff if your workspace requires Browser Automation integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Yutu when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
You have access to required keys: YUTU_CREDENTIAL, YUTU_CACHE_TOKEN, YUTU_ROOT.
Primary tools included: YouTube Data API v3 integration for video and channel management, OAuth 2.0 authentication with token caching, CLI and MCP server interfaces for automation.

Explore Yutu Details

Choose Sniff when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sniff Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Yutu eat-pray-ai Browser Automation	S Sniff Browser Automation
Summary	A fully functional MCP server and CLI for YouTube to automate YouTube operation	QA + a11y scanner: walks your running app's real user flows and reports what's broken.
Category & Scope	Browser Automation	Browser Automation
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Yutu Tools (5)

YouTube Data API v3 integration for video and channel management

OAuth 2.0 authentication with token caching

CLI and MCP server interfaces for automation

Support for YouTube Analytics and Reporting APIs (optional)

Configurable credential and token paths via environment variables

Sniff Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Yutu Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "eat-pray-ai-yutu": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ],
      "env": {
        "YUTU_CREDENTIAL": "YOUR_YUTU_CREDENTIAL_HERE",
        "YUTU_CACHE_TOKEN": "YOUR_YUTU_CACHE_TOKEN_HERE",
        "YUTU_ROOT": "YOUR_YUTU_ROOT_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Sniff Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sniff": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sniff"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Yutu is categorized under Browser Automation and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Sniff belongs to Browser Automation using local stdio subprocess. Select Yutu when you need capabilities focused on browser automation and Sniff when you require tools for browser automation.

More alternatives to Yutu More alternatives to Sniff Browser Automation category hub