Obsidian Codex Mcp vs Mnemostack

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
O
Obsidian Codex Mcp
dot-RealityTest
🧠 Knowledge & Memory
M
Mnemostack
udjin-labs
🧠 Knowledge & Memory
SummaryLocal-first Obsidian vault MCP server for Codex, Claude Desktop, and other MCP clients. Works directly with markdown files, no Obsidian plugin, API key, cloud service, or running Obsidian app required. Includes read-only mode, backup-on-write, path isolation, and setup examples.Durable hybrid memory for AI agents. Combines vector search, BM25, temporal retrieval, and optional Memgraph knowledge graph via reciprocal rank fusion. 6 MCP tools: health, search, answer, feedback, graphquery, graphaddtriple. Self-hosted with Qdrant backend. 82.5% strict accuracy on LoCoMo benchmark. pip install 'mnemostack[mcp]'
Quality signal25/100 (Emerging)23/100 (Emerging)
Install pathpip · highnpx · low
Engagement 0 0 0 9 0 0 0
ToolsNot listed yetNot listed yet
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView Obsidian Codex McpView Mnemostack
More alternatives to Obsidian Codex McpMore alternatives to MnemostackKnowledge & Memory category

Other servers like Obsidian Codex Mcp