Dlp MCP vs ToolTrust Scanner

In-depth architectural comparison of the Dlp MCP and ToolTrust Scanner MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Dlp MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: planScan, triggerScan, getScanDetails.

Explore Dlp MCP Details

Choose ToolTrust Scanner when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: tooltrust_scan_config, tooltrust_scan_server, tooltrust_scanner_scan.

Explore ToolTrust Scanner Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Dlp MCP Developer Tools	ToolTrust Scanner Developer Tools
Summary	The DLP MCP provides the compliance violation in the one drive, google drive documents.	Scans MCP servers for prompt injection, data exfiltration, and privilege escalation.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dlp-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "dlp-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tooltrust-scanner": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons