Discrete Structures vs Footnote

In-depth architectural comparison of the Discrete Structures and Footnote MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Discrete Structures when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Discrete Structures Details

F

Choose Footnote when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Footnote Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Discrete Structures Developer Tools	F Footnote Developer Tools
Summary	Comprehensive tools for discrete mathematics: logic, algorithms, number theory, cryptography	Every number in an AI answer traces back to the rows that produced it.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "discrete-structures": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "uv"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "footnote": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@brick-byte/footnote"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons