What is the key difference between Dingdawg Compliance and Kody?

Dingdawg Compliance belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution, while Kody belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Dingdawg Compliance or Kody in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Dingdawg Compliance and Kody free or paid?

Dingdawg Compliance operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Kody operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Dingdawg Compliance lists 0 tools with 2 views and 1 GitHub stars. Kody lists 0 tools with 1 views and 673 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Dingdawg Compliance and Kody together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Dingdawg Compliance vs Kody

In-depth architectural comparison of the Dingdawg Compliance and Kody MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Dingdawg Compliance

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Kody

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Dingdawg Compliance if you need specialized Security tools running via a local process. Choose Kody if your workspace requires Security integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Dingdawg Compliance when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Dingdawg Compliance Details

Choose Kody when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kody Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Dingdawg Compliance Security	Kody Security
Summary	EU AI Act + Colorado AI Act compliance scoring. 87/100 in 60 seconds. Free local scan.	Personal assistant MCP server with search, execute, packages, jobs, secrets, and integrations.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Dingdawg Compliance Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Kody Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Dingdawg Compliance Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dingdawg-compliance": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "dingdawg-compliance"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Kody Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kody": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "create-epicflare"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Dingdawg Compliance is categorized under Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Kody belongs to Security using local stdio subprocess. Select Dingdawg Compliance when you need capabilities focused on security and Kody when you require tools for security.

More alternatives to Dingdawg Compliance More alternatives to Kody Security category hub