Dingdawg Compliance vs Ida Pro MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Dingdawg Compliance and Ida Pro MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Dingdawg Compliance when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Dingdawg Compliance Details

Choose Ida Pro MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
• Primary tools included: IDA Pro decompilation access, Disassembly inspection, Database comments, renaming, and type updates.

Explore Ida Pro MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Dingdawg Compliance Security	Ida Pro MCP mrexodia Security
Summary	EU AI Act + Colorado AI Act compliance scoring. 87/100 in 60 seconds. Free local scan.	MCP server for IDA Pro, allowing you to perform binary analysis with AI assistants. This plugin implement decompilation, disassembly and allows you to generate malware analysis reports automatically.
Category & Scope	Security

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dingdawg-compliance": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "dingdawg-compliance"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mrexodia-ida-pro-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "https"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons