What is the key difference between Cellar and IMessage MCP?

Cellar belongs to the OS Automation category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution, while IMessage MCP belongs to the OS Automation category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Cellar or IMessage MCP in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Cellar and IMessage MCP free or paid?

Cellar operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). IMessage MCP operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Cellar lists 6 tools with 2 views and 4 GitHub stars. IMessage MCP lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Cellar and IMessage MCP together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Cellar or IMessage MCP in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Cellar and IMessage MCP free to use, or do they require API keys?

Cellar is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . IMessage MCP operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Cellar and IMessage MCP at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both dimpagk92-cellar and imessage-mcp as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Cellar has a Quality Score of 55 /100 ( Good ) with 2 views, 0 installs, and 4 GitHub stars. IMessage MCP holds a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Cellar vs IMessage MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cellar and IMessage MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Cellar

OS Automation · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 55/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required

IMessage MCP

OS Automation · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Cellar if you need specialized OS Automation tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose IMessage MCP if your workspace requires OS Automation integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Cellar when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the OS Automation domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: ContextElement and ContextSnapshot modeling and merging, Memory trait with session, scope, and write hook support, Local SQLite and vector search memory backend.

Explore Cellar Details

Choose IMessage MCP when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the OS Automation domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore IMessage MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Cellar dimpagk92 OS Automation	I IMessage MCP OS Automation
Summary	Hybrid computer-use runtime. Fuses accessibility tree + Chrome DevTools Protocol + vision into structured context with per-element confidence. 4 MCP tools (see/act/think/perceive). Continuous awareness engine (Cortex) with freshness + side-effect detection. Works offline with Ollama + local models.	25 tools for searching, analyzing, and exploring your iMessage history on macOS.
Category & Scope	OS Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Cellar Tools (6)

ContextElement and ContextSnapshot modeling and merging

Memory trait with session, scope, and write hook support

Local SQLite and vector search memory backend

Brief assembly with budgeting, governance, and receipts

Action, planning, and execution receipt schemas

LLM summarizers supporting Anthropic and Ollama models

IMessage MCP Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Cellar Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dimpagk92-cellar": {
      "url": "https://crates.io/"
    }
  }
}

IMessage MCP Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "imessage-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "imessage-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Cellar is categorized under OS Automation and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, IMessage MCP belongs to OS Automation using local stdio subprocess. Select Cellar when you need capabilities focused on os automation and IMessage MCP when you require tools for os automation.

More alternatives to Cellar More alternatives to IMessage MCP OS Automation category hub