Deepnets — Solana Token Intelligence vs Solenrich

In-depth architectural comparison of the Deepnets — Solana Token Intelligence and Solenrich MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

D

Choose Deepnets — Solana Token Intelligence when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: token_safety, token_stats, token_holder_graph.

Explore Deepnets — Solana Token Intelligence Details

Choose Solenrich when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Solenrich Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	D Deepnets — Solana Token Intelligence Finance & Fintech	Solenrich Finance & Fintech
Summary	Solana token intelligence for trading agents: safety, holder graphs, funding networks, research.	Solana onchain intelligence for AI agents: wallet risk, due-diligence, perps funding, smart money.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "deepnets-solana-token-intelligence": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@deepnets/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "solenrich": {
      "url": "https://api.solenrich.com/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons