CI Control Bridge vs Fritzbox Mcp Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the CI Control Bridge and Fritzbox Mcp Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose CI Control Bridge when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Home Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_vcp_code, set_vcp_code, get_brightness.

Explore CI Control Bridge Details

Choose Fritzbox Mcp Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Home Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: other (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: FRITZ!Box device and status management, WiFi configuration, Network settings management.

Explore Fritzbox Mcp Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	CI Control Bridge DDC Home Automation	Fritzbox Mcp Server kambriso Home Automation
Summary	Control monitor brightness, contrast, power and input via DDC/CI with MCP and MQTT support.	Control AVM FRITZ!Box routers - manage devices, WiFi, network settings, parental controls, and schedule time-delayed actions
Category & Scope	Home Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ddc-ci-control-bridge": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ddc-ci-control-bridge"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kambriso-fritzbox-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "kambriso-fritzbox-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons