Data Profiler vs FsOpenXmlDsl MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Data Profiler and FsOpenXmlDsl MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Data Profiler when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Data Profiler Details

F

Choose FsOpenXmlDsl MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FsOpenXmlDsl MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Data Profiler Workplace & Productivity	F FsOpenXmlDsl MCP Server Workplace & Productivity
Summary	Profile local CSV, Parquet, JSON and Excel files into a compact data-quality summary.	Exposes Kookerella.FsOpenXmlDsl's Excel read/write/code-gen as MCP tools for AI agents.
Category & Scope	Workplace & Productivity	Workplace & Productivity

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "data-profiler": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-data-profiler"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fsopenxmldsl-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "fsopenxmldsl-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons