Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Dashclaw vs Gas Library Hub
In-depth architectural comparison of the Dashclaw and Gas Library Hub MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Dashclaw
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Gas Library Hub
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Dashclaw if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Gas Library Hub if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
D
Choose Dashclaw when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
G
Choose Gas Library Hub when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
- Primary tools included: search_libraries, get_library_details.
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Dashclaw Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Gas Library Hub Tools (2)
search_libraries
GASライブラリをキーワード・タグ・Star数で検索
get_library_details
ライブラリ詳細情報を取得（AI要約・使用例含む）
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Dashclaw Configuration
Gas Library Hub Configuration