What is the key difference between Dashclaw and Feeds?

Dashclaw belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while Feeds belongs to the Developer Tools category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Dashclaw or Feeds in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Dashclaw and Feeds free or paid?

Dashclaw operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Feeds operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Dashclaw lists 0 tools with 0 views and 300 GitHub stars. Feeds lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Dashclaw and Feeds together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Dashclaw vs Feeds

In-depth architectural comparison of the Dashclaw and Feeds MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Dashclaw

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required

Feeds

Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 30/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Dashclaw if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Feeds if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Dashclaw when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Dashclaw Details

Choose Feeds when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Feeds Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	D Dashclaw Developer Tools	F Feeds Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for DashClaw governance — guard, record, invoke, and discover capabilities.	Congress trades, BTC ETF flows, SEC Form 4 insiders — every record says when we first saw it
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Dashclaw Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Feeds Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Dashclaw Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dashclaw": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "dashclaw"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Feeds Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "feeds": {
      "url": "https://insidercable.com"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Dashclaw is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Feeds belongs to Developer Tools using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Dashclaw when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Feeds when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Dashclaw More alternatives to Feeds Developer Tools category hub

Related MCP Server Comparisons

Popular comparisons with Dashclaw

Popular comparisons with Feeds

T
Feeds vs Tldraw