Convika vs Patchlog

In-depth architectural comparison of the Convika and Patchlog MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Convika when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Convika Details

Choose Patchlog when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Patchlog Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Convika Developer Tools	Patchlog Developer Tools
Summary	Create, preview, publish, and measure landing pages from Claude, Codex, or any MCP client.	Create, update, and publish changelog entries on your Patchlog changelog from any MCP client.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "convika": {
      "url": "https://convika.com/?utm_source=mcp_registry&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=mcp_directory"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "patchlog": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "patchlog-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons