What is the key difference between Convika and FormEdge?

Convika belongs to the Developer Tools category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution, while FormEdge belongs to the Developer Tools category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Convika or FormEdge in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Convika and FormEdge free or paid?

Convika operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). FormEdge operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Convika lists 0 tools with 3 views and 0 GitHub stars. FormEdge lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Convika and FormEdge together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Convika vs FormEdge

In-depth architectural comparison of the Convika and FormEdge MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Convika

Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 42/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

FormEdge

Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 42/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Convika if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose FormEdge if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Convika when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Convika Details

Choose FormEdge when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FormEdge Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Convika Developer Tools	F FormEdge Developer Tools
Summary	Create, preview, publish, and measure landing pages from Claude, Codex, or any MCP client.	Create, edit, preview and publish FormEdge forms and landing pages, and review submissions.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Convika Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

FormEdge Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Convika Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "convika": {
      "url": "https://convika.com/?utm_source=mcp_registry&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=mcp_directory"
    }
  }
}

FormEdge Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "formedge": {
      "url": "https://formedge.app/developers"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Convika is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, FormEdge belongs to Developer Tools using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Convika when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and FormEdge when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Convika More alternatives to FormEdge Developer Tools category hub

Related MCP Server Comparisons

Popular comparisons with Convika

Popular comparisons with FormEdge

FormEdge vs Flow2