Actionforge vs Convika

In-depth architectural comparison of the Actionforge and Convika MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Actionforge when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Actionforge Details

C

Choose Convika when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Convika Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Actionforge Developer Tools	C Convika Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for ActionForge: expose your account's tools to Claude and any MCP client.	Create, preview, publish, and measure landing pages from Claude, Codex, or any MCP client.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "actionforge": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "actionforge-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "convika": {
      "url": "https://convika.com/?utm_source=mcp_registry&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=mcp_directory"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons