Context Keeper vs Memorix

In-depth architectural comparison of the Context Keeper and Memorix MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Context Keeper when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Context Keeper Details

Choose Memorix when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Memorix Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Context Keeper Knowledge & Memory	Memorix Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Project memory for Claude: decisions, pipelines, and constraints across conversations.	Local-first persistent project memory for AI coding agents across MCP clients and sessions.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "context-keeper": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "context-keeper-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "memorix": {
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AVIDS2/memorix/main/assets/readme-hero.svg"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons