Conqueror vs FUTIA

In-depth architectural comparison of the Conqueror and FUTIA MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Conqueror when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Conqueror Details

F

Choose FUTIA when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FUTIA Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Conqueror Marketing	F FUTIA Marketing
Summary	Turns SEO insight into page changes: keyword research, SERP and rank data, rewrites you approve.	SEO answers for AI agents: Search Console reads free, plus competitor, keyword, backlink, SERP data.
Category & Scope	Marketing	Marketing
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "conqueror-2": {
      "url": "https://winwith.conquerorapp.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "futia": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "futia"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons