Confluence vs Asana

In-depth architectural comparison of the Confluence and Asana MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Confluence when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: confluence_list_pages, confluence_get_page, confluence_search.

Explore Confluence Details

Choose Asana when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Asana Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Confluence Workplace & Productivity	Asana Workplace & Productivity
Summary	Confluence MCP — wraps the Confluence Cloud REST API v2 (OAuth)	Asana MCP — wraps the Asana REST API (OAuth)
Category & Scope	Workplace & Productivity	Workplace & Productivity
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "confluence": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "asana": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons