A2atlassian vs Confluence

In-depth architectural comparison of the A2atlassian and Confluence MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose A2atlassian when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: login, logout, list_connections.

Explore A2atlassian Details

C

Choose Confluence when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: confluence_list_pages, confluence_get_page, confluence_search.

Explore Confluence Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A2atlassian Workplace & Productivity	C Confluence Workplace & Productivity
Summary	Jira & Confluence for AI agents. Pre-configured connections, compact output.	Confluence MCP — wraps the Confluence Cloud REST API v2 (OAuth)
Category & Scope	Workplace & Productivity	Workplace & Productivity
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "a2atlassian": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--from"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "confluence": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons