ComOS Federation Gateway vs Seerxo

In-depth architectural comparison of the ComOS Federation Gateway and Seerxo MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ComOS Federation Gateway when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the E-Commerce domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ComOS Federation Gateway Details

Choose Seerxo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the E-Commerce domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Seerxo Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	ComOS Federation Gateway E-Commerce	Seerxo E-Commerce
Summary	Multi-tenant MCP gateway for AI commerce. One connection, every store.	Generate SEO-optimized Etsy listings — title, description, and 13 tags — from your AI assistant.
Category & Scope	E-Commerce	E-Commerce
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "comos-federation-gateway-2": {
      "url": "https://mcp.comos-gateway.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "seerxo": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "seerxo"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons