A side-by-side look at the Clevra and Fieldproxy MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Clevra for support & service management work over a hosted endpoint; choose Fieldproxy for support & service management over a hosted endpoint. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
C
Choose Clevra when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Support & Service Management domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Fieldproxy tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Clevra is categorized under Support & Service Management and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Fieldproxy belongs to Support & Service Management and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Pick Clevra for support & service management work and Fieldproxy for support & service management.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Clevra has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Fieldproxy has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add clevra and fieldproxy as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Clevra has a quality signal of 37/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. Fieldproxy has 40/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.