Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Claudexor vs Baton
In-depth architectural comparison of the Claudexor and Baton MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Claudexor
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Baton
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Claudexor if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Baton if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
C
Choose Claudexor when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
B
Choose Baton when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Claudexor Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Baton Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Claudexor Configuration
Baton Configuration
Frequently Asked Questions
More alternatives to ClaudexorMore alternatives to BatonDeveloper Tools category hubCanonical compare URL