Chartforge vs Drawx MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Chartforge and Drawx MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Chartforge when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Data Visualization domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: generate_chart, refine_chart, list_styles.

Explore Chartforge Details

Choose Drawx MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Data Visualization domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: generate_diagram, architect_design, whoami.

Explore Drawx MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Chartforge Data Visualization	Drawx MCP Server Data Visualization
Summary	MCP server for ChartForge — generate stunning charts and diagrams from natural language	Generate draw.io diagrams and architecture designs from natural language, via the DrawX API.
Category & Scope	Data Visualization	Data Visualization

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "chartforge": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "chartforge-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "drawx-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@drawx/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons