Drawx MCP Server vs PaperBanana

In-depth architectural comparison of the Drawx MCP Server and PaperBanana MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Drawx MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Data Visualization domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: generate_diagram, architect_design, whoami.

Explore Drawx MCP Server Details

Choose PaperBanana when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Data Visualization domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PaperBanana Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Drawx MCP Server Data Visualization	PaperBanana Data Visualization
Summary	Generate draw.io diagrams and architecture designs from natural language, via the DrawX API.	Generate academic diagrams and statistical plots from text using multi-agent AI.
Category & Scope	Data Visualization	Data Visualization

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "drawx-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@drawx/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "paperbanana": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "paperbanana"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons