Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Cds Db Nlquery MCP vs MCP Local WP
In-depth architectural comparison of the Cds Db Nlquery MCP and MCP Local WP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Cds Db Nlquery MCP
Databases · Local stdio
Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
MCP Local WP
Databases · Local stdio
Quality: 52/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Cds Db Nlquery MCP if you need specialized Databases tools running via a local process. Choose MCP Local WP if your workspace requires Databases integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
C
Choose Cds Db Nlquery MCP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
M
Choose MCP Local WP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
- Primary tools included: sql, params, table.
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Cds Db Nlquery MCP Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
MCP Local WP Tools (3)
sql
params
table
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Cds Db Nlquery MCP Configuration
MCP Local WP Configuration