BTCFi API vs Concierge Intel

In-depth architectural comparison of the BTCFi API and Concierge Intel MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose BTCFi API when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore BTCFi API Details

C

Choose Concierge Intel when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Concierge Intel Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	BTCFi API Finance & Fintech	C Concierge Intel Finance & Fintech
Summary	Bitcoin data for AI agents. 27 tools with x402 micropayments. No API keys needed.	Pay-per-call DeFi and macro intel for AI agents. x402 USDC tools via streamable HTTP /api/mcp.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "btcfi-api": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@aiindigo/btcfi-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "concierge-intel": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "concierge-intel"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons