Browser MCP vs Weboperator

In-depth architectural comparison of the Browser MCP and Weboperator MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Browser MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Browser MCP Details

Choose Weboperator when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Weboperator Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Browser MCP Developer Tools	Weboperator Developer Tools
Summary	Hosted real Google Chrome MCP with per-user persistent state. Navigate, click, type, screenshot.	Hands your live Chrome tab to any MCP client — snapshot, navigate, click, type, extract.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "browser-mcp-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "browser-mcp-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "weboperator": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "weboperator"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons