Bis vs Ilostat

In-depth architectural comparison of the Bis and Ilostat MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

B

Choose Bis when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Bis Details

Choose Ilostat when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ilostat Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	B Bis Developer Tools	Ilostat Developer Tools
Summary	BIS MCP — Bank for International Settlements statistics (no auth)	ILOSTAT (International Labour Organization statistics) MCP — global labour
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bis": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ilostat": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons