Bagiq vs Claudinho

In-depth architectural comparison of the Bagiq and Claudinho MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Bagiq when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Sports domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Gap detection, Overlap analysis, Filler recommendations.

Explore Bagiq Details

Choose Claudinho when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Sports domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Live 2026 men's World Cup scores, Fixture and schedule lookup, Group standings.

Explore Claudinho Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Bagiq VerifiedSports	Claudinho arturogarrido Sports
Summary	Tools for analyzing and optimizing disc golf bags, including gap detection, overlap analysis, filler recommendations, and building minimal bags.	Live scores, fixtures, standings, and read-only prediction-market signals for the 2026 World Cup. No API keys.
Category & Scope

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bagiq": {
      "url": "https://data.bagiq.app/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "arturogarrido-claudinho": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@claudinho/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons