Claudinho vs Bagiq

In-depth architectural comparison of the Claudinho and Bagiq MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Claudinho when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Sports domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Live 2026 men's World Cup scores, Fixture and schedule lookup, Group standings.

Explore Claudinho Details

Choose Bagiq when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Sports domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Gap detection, Overlap analysis, Filler recommendations.

Explore Bagiq Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Claudinho arturogarrido Sports	Bagiq VerifiedSports
Summary	Live scores, fixtures, standings, and read-only prediction-market signals for the 2026 World Cup. No API keys.	Tools for analyzing and optimizing disc golf bags, including gap detection, overlap analysis, filler recommendations, and building minimal bags.
Category & Scope

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "arturogarrido-claudinho": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@claudinho/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bagiq": {
      "url": "https://data.bagiq.app/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons