Backtest360 vs TemplateFox MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Backtest360 and TemplateFox MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Backtest360 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: engine_info, get_me, get_catalog.

Explore Backtest360 Details

Choose TemplateFox MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: generate_pdf, generate_pdf_async, get_pdf_job_status.

Explore TemplateFox MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Backtest360 Developer Tools	TemplateFox MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server exposing the Backtest360 engine API as tools for AI agents.	MCP server for TemplateFox PDF generation API - Generate PDFs from templates via AI assistants
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "backtest360": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "backtest360-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-server-76": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@templatefox/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons