Formacv vs TemplateFox MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Formacv and TemplateFox MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Formacv when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: format_cv, tailor_cv, anonymize_cv.

Explore Formacv Details

Choose TemplateFox MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: generate_pdf, generate_pdf_async, get_pdf_job_status.

Explore TemplateFox MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Formacv Developer Tools	TemplateFox MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	FormaCV MCP server for AI-powered CV formatting, anonymization, tailoring, and ATS push-back.	MCP server for TemplateFox PDF generation API - Generate PDFs from templates via AI assistants
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "formacv": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@formacv/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-server-76": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@templatefox/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons