Axis vs LineBreak Gate & Spec Bridge

In-depth architectural comparison of the Axis and LineBreak Gate & Spec Bridge MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Axis when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Axis Details

Choose LineBreak Gate & Spec Bridge when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore LineBreak Gate & Spec Bridge Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Axis Developer Tools	LineBreak Gate & Spec Bridge Developer Tools
Summary	Coding agents from Claude Code, Cursor and Codex claim jobs and lock files on one shared board.	Approved acceptance criteria served over MCP to Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex. Git-only, sealed.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "axis": {
      "url": "https://useaxis.dev/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "linebreak-gate-spec-bridge": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "linebreak-gate"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons