Autotask vs Incidentoracle

In-depth architectural comparison of the Autotask and Incidentoracle MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Autotask when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Support & Service Management domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: autotask_search_companies, autotask_create_company, autotask_update_company.

Explore Autotask Details

Choose Incidentoracle when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Support & Service Management domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: log_incident, classify_incident, major_incident_check.

Explore Incidentoracle Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Autotask Support & Service Management	Incidentoracle Support & Service Management
Summary	MCP server for Kaseya Autotask PSA — companies, tickets, projects, time entries, and more.	IncidentOracle - 12-tool incident management MCP: triage, BaFin DORA reporting, RCA.
Category & Scope	Support & Service Management	Support & Service Management

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "autotask": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "github:WYRE-AI/autotask-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "incidentoracle": {
      "url": "https://tooloracle.io/incident/mcp/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons