Atom.com — Premium Domains vs Tnl

In-depth architectural comparison of the Atom.com — Premium Domains and Tnl MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Atom.com — Premium Domains when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_brandable_domains, check_domain_availability, generate_domain_names.

Explore Atom.com — Premium Domains Details

Choose Tnl when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Structured contract schema with fixed fields (id, scope, paths, behaviors, etc.), Agent-driven proposal and human approval workflow for contract edits, Self-attestation by agents mapping MUST clauses to code or tests.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Atom.com — Premium Domains Legal	Tnl janaraj Legal
Summary
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "atom-com-premium-domains": {
      "url": "https://modelcontextprotocol.io"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "janaraj-tnl": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "typed-nl"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons