Astronomy MCP Server vs Orbit

In-depth architectural comparison of the Astronomy MCP Server and Orbit MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Astronomy MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: astronomy_get_sky_position, astronomy_get_rise_set, astronomy_get_moon_phase.

Explore Astronomy MCP Server Details

Choose Orbit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Orbit Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Astronomy MCP Server Aerospace & Astrodynamics	Orbit Aerospace & Astrodynamics
Summary	Offline observational astronomy: positions, rise/set, moon phases, eclipses, and seasons.	Orbit's local-first task and workflow registry for coding agents.
Category & Scope	Aerospace & Astrodynamics	Aerospace & Astrodynamics

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "astronomy-mcp-server": {
      "command": "bunx",
      "args": [
        "@cyanheads/astronomy-mcp-server@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "orbit-4": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@orbit-tools/cli@"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons