Astro vs TuViMCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Astro and TuViMCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Astro when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Spirituality & Esoterica domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Astro Details

Choose TuViMCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Spirituality & Esoterica domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: generate_image, True, name.

Explore TuViMCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Astro Spirituality & Esoterica	TuViMCP nmhaaa3218 Spirituality & Esoterica
Summary	Multi-tradition astrology. 19 modes, 18 tools. Deterministic ephemeris engine.	Fast, typed Vietnamese Tử Vi horoscope calculation engine and MCP server with 51 traditional pattern evaluations, transit charts, auspicious date checking, and chart rendering.
Category & Scope	Spirituality & Esoterica

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "astro": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nmhaaa3218-tuvimcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "tuvi-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons