In-depth architectural comparison of the Astrea (Aurum) and CADE: Processos MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Astrea (Aurum)
Legal · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
CADE: Processos
Legal · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Astrea (Aurum) if you need specialized Legal tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose CADE: Processos if your workspace requires Legal integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Astrea (Aurum) when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Astrea (Aurum) is categorized under Legal and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, CADE: Processos belongs to Legal using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Astrea (Aurum) when you need capabilities focused on legal and CADE: Processos when you require tools for legal.