Astrea (Aurum) vs DataJud (CNJ) — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Astrea (Aurum) vs DataJud (CNJ)
In-depth architectural comparison of the Astrea (Aurum) and DataJud (CNJ) MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Astrea (Aurum)
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 33/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
DataJud (CNJ)
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 32/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Astrea (Aurum) if you need specialized Legal tools running via a local process. Choose DataJud (CNJ) if your workspace requires Legal integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Astrea (Aurum) when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Astrea (Aurum) is categorized under Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, DataJud (CNJ) belongs to Legal using local stdio subprocess. Select Astrea (Aurum) when you need capabilities focused on legal and DataJud (CNJ) when you require tools for legal.