Aseprite Live vs FunseaAI Unity MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Aseprite Live and FunseaAI Unity MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose Aseprite Live when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: status, get_sprite_info, get_pixel.

Explore Aseprite Live Details

Choose FunseaAI Unity MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FunseaAI Unity MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A Aseprite Live Gaming	FunseaAI Unity MCP Gaming
Summary	Unity-first MCP for live Aseprite: Unity export, art-QA, iso tools, resources + prompts	stdio bridge for the local Unity Editor MCP server from FunseaAI/unity-mcp.
Category & Scope	Gaming	Gaming
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aseprite-live": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "aseprite-live-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "funseaai-unity-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "funseaai-unity-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons