Apology vs Performance Review

In-depth architectural comparison of the Apology and Performance Review MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Apology when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Apology Details

Choose Performance Review when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Performance Review Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Apology Social Media	Performance Review Social Media
Summary	apology MCP — wraps StupidAPIs (requires X-API-Key)	performance-review MCP — wraps StupidAPIs (requires X-API-Key)
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "apology": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "performance-review": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons