Apify Mcp Server vs CSS SOTA

In-depth architectural comparison of the Apify Mcp Server and CSS SOTA MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Apify Mcp Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: title, readOnlyHint, true.

Explore Apify Mcp Server Details

C

Choose CSS SOTA when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore CSS SOTA Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Apify Mcp Server Developer Tools	C CSS SOTA Developer Tools
Summary	Extract data from any website with thousands of scrapers, crawlers, and automations on Apify Store ⚡	What CSS you can actually ship today, from live Baseline data and MDN browser-compat-data.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "apify-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@apify/actors-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "css-sota": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "css-sota"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons