A side-by-side look at the Emailmd and SiteCheck MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Emailmd for communication work as a local process; choose SiteCheck for communication over a hosted endpoint. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Emailmd when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
SiteCheck tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Emailmd is categorized under Communication and uses a local stdio subprocess. SiteCheck belongs to Communication and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Pick Emailmd for communication work and SiteCheck for communication.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Emailmd is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. SiteCheck is listed as a paid service. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add anypost-emailmd and sitecheck as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Emailmd has a quality signal of 64/100 (Good) with 2 views, 0 installs and 1,380 GitHub stars. SiteCheck has 43/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.